• BGM: Creep by Prince

    半夜2点30分,在PONPON家里做完广告视频,出门打车回家。不知道是不是最近出租车涨价的原因,半夜车狂多,或者根本就是茅台路上没有人。走出小区门,每辆计程车都在我面前减速,见我无意上车再加速开走。

    我喜欢半夜在没有人的街上走,在重庆这样,在北京这样,在成都这样,在布里斯托这样,在伦敦这样,在上海还是这样——前提是要有不错的歌。这次塞耳朵里面的是反复重复的一首CREEP,不断反复不断反复。

    开始的吉它就不是。近似无限循环的那几个旋律,直到PRINCE的声音出来。

    I was there before, couldn't look in the eyes.

    这不是那首6年前的歌。6年前唱的是:when you were here before, I couldn't look in your eyes.

    6年前,RADIOHEAD唱的是无法面对美好的你,而自我憎恶。憎恶自己的低,亦憎恶自己的俗似身边的所有人。而你是如此的完美,如羽毛飘在空中;只是看着你的皮肤,就能让自己感动地流泪。那份不可言的渴望,渴望自己能变得与众不同,一定要与众不同,才能配上如此与众不同的你。

    6年后,Prince唱的还是你。自己已经经历过那一切了,回头看去,这些种种对自我的憎恨竟是如此讽刺。你亦希望自己是如此特别,你也不会在意在这特别与平常间对比的过程中,是不是会有人受到伤害。你在这做什么?你只是要控制一切。你只是一个撒谎的人。你是想要一个完美的身体,一个完美的灵魂,而当你不在的时候,我来负责帮你祈祷让你有完美的一切。很简单,因为我眼中的你是如此的与众不同。

    或者,我也是个撒谎的人。那么我们在这里做什么?

    Prince用1分51秒的时间来酝酿,直到唱出第一句。2:30时的两下失真,接上新编的solo,让如此熟悉的这首歌变得如此不同。4:53开始的solo直接把这首歌带入一个新的高潮。跟6年前有着天翻地覆的区别,去在那段情绪中摸到一丝跟过去近似的牵连。5:58开始的SHOO DO DO DO,不断升高又落下,再升高再落下。然后扯着嘶哑的声音喊着进入SOLO巅峰的状态,这是真正的高潮。

    比起那爆炸的两下扫线,6年改变了好多。

  • BGM: This Masquerade by George Benson

    上一次是Abandoned Masquerade,这一次是This Masquerade。

    Are we really happy with
    This lonely game we play
    Looking for the right words to say
    Searching but not finding
    Understanding anyway
    We're lost in this masquerade

    Both afraid to say we�re just too far away
    From being close together from the start
    We tried to talk it over
    But the words got in the way
    We're lost inside this lonely game we play

    throughts of leaving disappear
    Each time I see your eyes
    And no matter how hard I try
    To understand the reason
    Why we carry on this way
    And we're lost in this masquerade

    We tried to talk it over
    But the words got in the way
    We're lost inside this lonely game we play

    不多说,稍等片刻,听吧。

  • 开始前准备,最终选择的JC MANDARIN,制作布景板花了不少钱,设计基本沿用的之前的宣传的东西

    ---------

    超级助手帅迪SIMPLEDEE小帅小迪SD略懂先生,几乎跟我一样万能,然而他更年轻,还能熬夜做出这样的视频。毕业的时候跟我干好了。

     ----------

    PP和小轲确保现场爵士乐队的效果。PP的这一身以前看过了,小轲这一身倒是第一次。话说SD让我想起大学时候的小轲。这两人有点像

    -----------

    啊……我最喜欢的裙子队,由UCL代表小伊丽莎白带队。嗯,我喜欢这个工作。

    -----------

    Vivienne做头发的时候在背台词,一进来就赶紧排练开场

    -----------

    瑷妡每次都是闪亮出场的,然后被交代很多工作做

    -----------

    JC的GM,宴会经理,穿我衬衣的JASON,终于穿正装的BOBBY:“布莱尔要到了”

    -----------

    话说她要到的时候,我们现场还没有准备好,但也没有办法只有赶紧跑到门口去接。比起前一天的新闻发布会的时候的媒体覆盖少了很多。后面跟着布莱尔的女儿(左)和助手(右)

    -----------

    小轲非常淡定的带嘉宾入场

    -----------

    现场买票的人远超之前的估计,本来420个人的位置不得不又加到460

    -----------

    典型的开场方法,跟新东方有点像,效果蛮不错。

    -----------

    Vivienne在前一天晚上超紧张,上台后倒还蛮好

    -----------

    谈话嘉宾(从左到右):谭盾夫人JANE,主持人崔燕,前英国首相夫人切丽布莱尔,来自麦肯锡的SASHA(Principle)

    -----------

    酒会中的纪念:V,崔燕,SASHA,梁上燕,JANE,M

    -----------

    大学同学

    -----------

    头脑风暴主持人

    -----------

    崔艳

    -----------

    与Mrs. Blair 和出版社的朋友(只有顺便宣传一下她的书了...)

    -----------

    Private salon

    -----------

    活动完啦,Elizabeth好得意,不过做这次的活动真的辛苦这些孩子了

    -----------

    两只略懂先生,帅迪真是好玩

    ----------

    据说要重组大学时候的乐队哎

    -----------

    VINE团队小集体照

    -----------

    VINE团队大集体照(PP couple缺席...)

    持续更新ing

    -----------

    菜单确定,现场布景确定,装饰待定

    -----------

    现在才决定布景方

    -----------

    sam's tailor 第二次改衣服

    -----------

    ------------

    sam's tailor

    ------------

    外面天气38度,我也38度

    ------------

    JW Marriott => JC Mandarin=>JW Marriott => JC Mandarin=>JW Marriott => JC Mandarin=>...

    ------------

    海报改了无数次

    -------------

  • BGM: Man in the Mirror by Michael Jackson

     

    小学刚毕业进入初中的那个暑假,我在回家路上看到一个音像店窗口的屏幕再放Smooth Criminal,当时就呆住了。

    他是我唯一一个所有专辑都买的正版并且丢了还反复买从磁带买到CD,从小学买到大学的艺人

    他是我能够在刚进初中就狂学英语的根本原因——因为要会念他的歌词,还要念那么快...

    他是我的衬衣情节的初始

    他是我第一次了解“气场与氛围”这个概念有多重要的人

    他是唯一能让我老爸也跟着唱英文的人:“钉子螺丝”(dangerous!)

    他是我喜欢黑色的原因

    他是我唯一的偶像

    本来想在今年实现从小的梦想,去看他的现场演唱会……

    再见,MJ

  • 2009-05-27

    Wine & Jazz - [Shanghai]

    BGM: unknown by unknown band from JZ Club

    有点点可惜在JZ Club的时候没有听到这乐队的名字,不过还好,他们整晚的“实验JAZZ”——按照PP的说法——我们也很难接受啊。不过最好的,或者说最主流的一首被我偷拍下来了。只是当我意识到这首歌不错,赶紧掏出手机来拍的时候已经唱了一大半了。尽量忽略嘈杂的背景噪音吧,歌还是挺不错的。

    19号在上海某小别墅里面做的葡萄酒会现场。PP拍的最好的照片之一。

    左边的是DAVID葡萄牙某酒庄酿酒大师,中间的RUFUS是英国皇室御用酒商Berry Bros.&Rudd的中国代表,中文讲的不错;右边的Olivier,法国ecole-du-vin葡萄酒学校校长。19号整个上午都在浦东国际会展中心跟他搭档,做品酒会,对他的英语完全服气了。

    上海小分队

     

  • 2009-05-04

    Generations - [All bout Mingke]

    BGM: Layla by Eric Clapton

    父亲在整理照片的时候翻出了他和爷爷25岁时的照片。我也把自己的25岁的照片找出来,放在一起这么一看,看到了3个时代。

    其实爸爸和爷爷并不是非常像,我也和爷爷不那么像。原因还挺复杂的,家谱当中我理论上应该姓刘,因为血缘上亲生的爷爷家是刘家。而父亲出生时是双胞胎,被抱给罗家做儿子,另一个则留在刘家。而罗家是血缘上的奶奶家,父亲的养父即是奶奶的兄弟。虽然血缘不是亲生,但是父亲常说三代是一样的,现在排一排看貌似老爹是对的。

  • BGM: Autumn Mood by McCoy Tyner | Yesterdays by Stan Getz

    自从07年开始,因为JZ的现场受到小号的魅惑,到现在翻来覆去听MY FUNNY VALENTINE的两个版本CHET和MB的,都是因为小号。这首AUTUMN MOOD也是这样,完全是因为4:37的小号。虽然这首曲子是McCoy Tyner 97年发表的同名爵士钢琴专辑,但是整个六分钟的作品从后面3:34开始都是属于小号的。Yesterdays这个,则是整首歌都属于小号啦,特色是在2:21的时候。

    貌似这是第一次放一首没有人声的音乐。完了,我是不是要开始变老了……

    不过能在这里放这首歌可真不容易啊。首先我第一次“见到”,而不是“听到”这首歌是在北京某个靠近鼓楼的奇怪书店里面。也不能叫书店了,里面更像一个BAR,还在门口买了一个仿木头的笔记本。走进去后,黑漆漆的,墙上被客人画的乱七八糟的,不过音乐和氛围还好。然后在买笔记本的旁边,看到一排CD, Jazz & Blues Legends,非卖品,估计是某些杂志的赠送,但是这店是卖10块。随手看了一下Ella Fitzgerald,Louis Armstrong等等,懒得去网上找就买啦。

    结果还好有CD那,网上是找不到的。BAIDU,GOOGLE都没有,别说MP3,就是能找到这首歌的介绍都非常少。EMULE上只有一个源但是没有PEER。找不到链接就只有自己上传了吧,可是我的源又是iTune M4A的,原来的CD虽然在手边,但是光驱又坏了。就只有去找音频格式转换软件,GOLDWAVE不行,winAVI不行,最后居然是千千静听自带的转换器搞定的。然后上传到公司服务器上,终于可以链接出来啦。

    废话好多,真的变老了。

  • 这两天讲座之后总是被各种同学围着,但是却提的是类似问题。有很多基本情况,重庆的大学生朋友们了解的确实太少,被中介误导的也非常的多。

    首先,理工科的同学一定要清楚,虽然理工科的硕士拿奖学金比文商法科要高,但是硕士也分为授课类的和研究类的。而美国大多数的硕士都是研究类的(其授课类硕士通常都在LLM,或者较差的商学院里的非MBA课程,部分社会科学课程等等),英国则相反,大多数课程是授课类的,研究类的较少。简单的说,授课类的课程不需要你去泡很久的实验室,做很深的研究,而更偏向于怎么把已有的研究成果做成应用。而研究类硕士,不管是美国还是英国的,都是为PHD准备的,这是为什么研究类硕士比授课类硕士容易拿奖学金。也是为什么PHD拿奖学金的概率远远高于硕士。

    然后,申请英美理工科研究类硕士如果不去跟faculty或者教授套词,那么相同背景能去到的学校会差不少。PHD基本上不套词不可能申请到——当然也有例外,比如背景已经很牛了,教授授意给AD COM看见相关资料就拿钱要人的也有。

    由于商学院的问题太多,特别是最近问到读会计的非常非常多(貌似好多朋友都想去四大?)我先给几个最基本的提示:

    1. 申请商学院跟申请理工科的课程有着巨大的差异。理工科相对更看过去,商学院不仅看过去,还要看现在和将来。

    2. 美国的商学院很少提供非MBA的课程(比如市场营销,管理,金融等),前50当中提供此类课程的非常的少。比如如果你想读会计的Master,那么顶级商学院里面几乎没有这种课程,例如在HBS,就只有三个选择:1,MBA;2,PHD;3,EXECUTIVE PROGRAM。有些靠后的学校有,其课程设置跟英国的会计MASTER非常接近:课程长度是9月-1年的,不需要本科会计专业。比如University of North Carolina,总费用58k美元。英国很多类似课程也不需要本科的会计专业,也是1年时间,总费用20k英镑左右。

    3.会计跟金融不要搞混淆,对于通常情况下的学位价值而言,金融大于会计,申请难度也是这样。但是不得不再强调一下,好的美国商学院当中,单独把会计和金融拿出来做硕士课程的概率很小,而英国很多。

    4.本科毕业想直接去世界TOP30读MBA的同学,请回寝室继续睡觉。或者请出门左拐(www.chasedream.com www.vault.com )。

    5.申请美国好的商学院是考GMAT(因为课程几乎只有MBA),如果你申请非MBA的专业,那么有可能你需要考的是GRE。如果你不需要去好的商学院,那么可以不考GMAT。其实如果不去好的商学院,也就没有必要去商学院了。对于英国,OXBRIDGE和LES/IC会在部分课程强制要求GMAT和GRE成绩。而其它前十名的学校几乎都是建议你有GMAT/GRE成绩,也就意味着对你被录取的帮助很大。但是英国会给很多非MBA的专业出来,比如之前提到的金融硕士,会计硕士等等。对于这种课程,往往要的是GRE而不是GMAT,因为GMAT是对管理学设计的。

    今天在重大本部的讲座是本次高校巡讲的最后一场。结束之后,如果有时间,我会写一个这次巡讲的评估,总结一下重庆各大高校提出的问题。

    最后放上USNEW.COM的2009全球大学排名(仅供参考,大跌眼镜的,请扶住。要知道这样的“权威排名”有不少)http://www.usnews.com/articles/education/worlds-best-colleges/2008/11/20/worlds-best-colleges-and-universities-top-200.html

    Rank Overall Score
    1 Harvard University United States 100.0
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score100 Student to Faculty Score96 International Faculty Score87 International Students Score 81 Citations per Faculty Score 100
    2 Yale University United States 99.8
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score100 Student to Faculty Score100 International Faculty Score89 International Students Score 71 Citations per Faculty Score 98
    3 University of Cambridge United Kingdom 99.5
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score100 Student to Faculty Score99 International Faculty Score98 International Students Score 95 Citations per Faculty Score 89
    4 University of Oxford United Kingdom 98.9
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score100 Student to Faculty Score100 International Faculty Score96 International Students Score 96 Citations per Faculty Score 85
    5 California Institute of Technology (Caltech) United States 98.6
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score74 Student to Faculty Score98 International Faculty Score100 International Students Score 93 Citations per Faculty Score 100
    6 Imperial College London United Kingdom 98.4
    Academic Peer Review Score99 Employer Review Score100 Student to Faculty Score100 International Faculty Score98 International Students Score 100 Citations per Faculty Score 83
    7 University College London United Kingdom 98.1
    Academic Peer Review Score96 Employer Review Score99 Student to Faculty Score100 International Faculty Score96 International Students Score 100 Citations per Faculty Score 89
    8 University of Chicago United States 98.0
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score99 Student to Faculty Score98 International Faculty Score78 International Students Score 83 Citations per Faculty Score 91
    9 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) United States 96.7
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score100 Student to Faculty Score90 International Faculty Score33 International Students Score 94 Citations per Faculty Score 100
    10 Columbia University United States 96.3
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score99 Student to Faculty Score98 International Faculty Score29 International Students Score 89 Citations per Faculty Score 94
    11 University of Pennsylvania United States 96.1
    Academic Peer Review Score97 Employer Review Score98 Student to Faculty Score88 International Faculty Score83 International Students Score 79 Citations per Faculty Score 99
    12 Princeton University United States 95.7
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score98 Student to Faculty Score75 International Faculty Score91 International Students Score 82 Citations per Faculty Score 100
    13 Duke University United States 94.4
    Academic Peer Review Score97 Employer Review Score98 Student to Faculty Score100 International Faculty Score30 International Students Score 66 Citations per Faculty Score 94
    13 Johns Hopkins University United States 94.4
    Academic Peer Review Score99 Employer Review Score78 Student to Faculty Score100 International Faculty Score30 International Students Score 68 Citations per Faculty Score 100
    15 Cornell University United States 94.3
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score99 Student to Faculty Score90 International Faculty Score28 International Students Score 76 Citations per Faculty Score 96
    16 Australian National University Australia 92.0
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score93 Student to Faculty Score82 International Faculty Score99 International Students Score 91 Citations per Faculty Score 74
    17 Stanford University United States 91.2
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score100 Student to Faculty Score67 International Faculty Score26 International Students Score 87 Citations per Faculty Score 100
    18 University of Michigan United States 91.0
    Academic Peer Review Score99 Employer Review Score99 Student to Faculty Score85 International Faculty Score59 International Students Score 51 Citations per Faculty Score 84
    19 University of Tokyo Japan 90.0
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score94 Student to Faculty Score98 International Faculty Score27 International Students Score 40 Citations per Faculty Score 78
    20 McGill University Canada 89.7
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score97 Student to Faculty Score99 International Faculty Score62 International Students Score 95 Citations per Faculty Score 51
    21 Carnegie Mellon University United States 89.6
    Academic Peer Review Score95 Employer Review Score97 Student to Faculty Score82 International Faculty Score50 International Students Score 97 Citations per Faculty Score 79
    22 King's College London United Kingdom 89.5
    Academic Peer Review Score93 Employer Review Score98 Student to Faculty Score89 International Faculty Score91 International Students Score 85 Citations per Faculty Score 70
    23 University of Edinburgh United Kingdom 89.3
    Academic Peer Review Score96 Employer Review Score99 Student to Faculty Score82 International Faculty Score91 International Students Score 82 Citations per Faculty Score 70
    24 ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology) Switzerland 89.1
    Academic Peer Review Score95 Employer Review Score82 Student to Faculty Score56 International Faculty Score100 International Students Score 94 Citations per Faculty Score 99
    25 Kyoto University Japan 87.4
    Academic Peer Review Score99 Employer Review Score87 Student to Faculty Score80 International Faculty Score30 International Students Score 26 Citations per Faculty Score 91
    26 University of Hong Kong Hong Kong 87.1
    Academic Peer Review Score94 Employer Review Score90 Student to Faculty Score86 International Faculty Score100 International Students Score 92 Citations per Faculty Score 59
    27 Brown University United States 85.2
    Academic Peer Review Score92 Employer Review Score83 Student to Faculty Score64 International Faculty Score56 International Students Score 58 Citations per Faculty Score 99
    28 École Normale Supérieure, Paris France 84.8
    Academic Peer Review Score93 Employer Review Score72 Student to Faculty Score68 International Faculty Score29 International Students Score 69 Citations per Faculty Score 99
    29 University of Manchester United Kingdom 84.4
    Academic Peer Review Score91 Employer Review Score100 Student to Faculty Score82 International Faculty Score91 International Students Score 84 Citations per Faculty Score 56
    30 National University of Singapore (NUS) Singapore 84.3
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score98 Student to Faculty Score39 International Faculty Score100 International Students Score 100 Citations per Faculty Score 75
    30 University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) United States 84.3
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score98 Student to Faculty Score48 International Faculty Score23 International Students Score 36 Citations per Faculty Score 100
    32 University of Bristol United Kingdom 84.1
    Academic Peer Review Score83 Employer Review Score99 Student to Faculty Score82 International Faculty Score85 International Students Score 74 Citations per Faculty Score 74
    33 Northwestern University United States 83.3
    Academic Peer Review Score88 Employer Review Score97 Student to Faculty Score78 International Faculty Score30 International Students Score 61 Citations per Faculty Score 82
    34 École Polytechnique France 83.0
    Academic Peer Review Score80 Employer Review Score96 Student to Faculty Score100 International Faculty Score62 International Students Score 93 Citations per Faculty Score 58
    34 University of British Columbia Canada 83.0
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score93 Student to Faculty Score69 International Faculty Score33 International Students Score 61 Citations per Faculty Score 67
    36 University of California, Berkeley United States 82.9
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score100 Student to Faculty Score24 International Faculty Score88 International Students Score 36 Citations per Faculty Score 100
    37 The University of Sydney Australia 82.4
    Academic Peer Review Score99 Employer Review Score97 Student to Faculty Score55 International Faculty Score97 International Students Score 93 Citations per Faculty Score 54
    38 The University of Melbourne Australia 82.3
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score100 Student to Faculty Score59 International Faculty Score54 International Students Score 96 Citations per Faculty Score 56
    39 Hong Kong University of Science & Technology Hong Kong 81.4
    Academic Peer Review Score86 Employer Review Score90 Student to Faculty Score60 International Faculty Score100 International Students Score 97 Citations per Faculty Score 72
    40 New York University (NYU) United States 81.3
    Academic Peer Review Score96 Employer Review Score96 Student to Faculty Score83 International Faculty Score28 International Students Score 56 Citations per Faculty Score 54
    41 University of Toronto Canada 81.1
    Academic Peer Review Score100 Employer Review Score94 Student to Faculty Score18 International Faculty Score80 International Students Score 46 Citations per Faculty Score 100
    42 The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong 81.0
    Academic Peer Review Score85 Employer Review Score84 Student to Faculty Score80 International Faculty Score98 International Students Score 86 Citations per Faculty Score 57
    43 University of Queensland Australia 80.7
    Academic Peer Review Score95 Employer Review Score97 Student to Faculty Score49 International Faculty Score100 International Students Score 78 Citations per Faculty Score 63
    44 Osaka University Japan 80.1
    Academic Peer Review Score90 Employer Review Score69 Student to Faculty Score93 International Faculty Score25 International Students Score 28 Citations per Faculty Score 70
    45 University of New South Wales Australia 79.8
    Academic Peer Review Score97 Employer Review Score99 Student to Faculty Score35 International Faculty Score83 International Students Score 91 Citations per Faculty Score 68
    46 Boston University United States 79.1
    Academic Peer Review Score91 Employer Review Score85 Student to Faculty Score66 International Faculty Score26 International Students Score 59 Citations per Faculty Score 73
    47 Monash University Australia 78.7
    Academic Peer Review Score98 Employer Review Score99 Student to Faculty Score52 International Faculty Score99 International Students Score 99 Citations per Faculty Score 37
    48 University of Copenhagen Denmark 78.5
    Academic Peer Review Score88 Employer Review Score59 Student to Faculty Score100 International Faculty Score67 International Students Score 69 Citations per Faculty Score 45
    49 Trinity College Dublin Ireland 78.2
    Academic Peer Review Score90 Employer Review Score96 Student to Faculty Score68 International Faculty Score99 International Students Score 76 Citations per Faculty Score 42
    Source: QS Quacquarelli Symonds (www.topuniversities.com) See Schools 50-99 »

  • 2009-03-25

    Server down - [Notice]

    这几天每天有大量访问流入www.hambson.com直接导致挂机了……

    网站访问不稳定,1、2天之内应该能恢复

  • 川外的两场都是小场研讨会,回答问题的。所以最好提前准备好各种具体问题,比如“同时申请两个不同专业,PS怎么写”之类的。

    ---------3月24日---------

    申明:今日在西政讲座最后答疑时间中,冲上讲台拿话筒讲话的女生与我个人、与HAMBSON & PARTNERS没有任何关联。她所提及的“任职与新东方”、“茗柯说‘不推荐’也‘不不推荐’去新东方”以及其它种种言论,均未得到我个人以及HAMBSON&PARTNERS的认可或授权。本次讲座也与新东方没有任何关联。